By Chip Manuel, Ph.D., GOJO Industries, Inc., and Hal King, Ph.D., Managing Partner, Active Food Safety
May 2023 – For over 30 years, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Food Code1 has served as a model set of regulations for safeguarding public health and ensuring the safety of food when offered to the consumer in retail food establishments. It represents FDA's best advice for a uniform system of provisions that address the safety and protection of food offered at retail and in food service. In response to an everchanging landscape of consumer food practices and preferences, emerging business models, and evolving science, the FDA Food Code changes over time. Generally, the Code is updated every 2 to 5 years, and the most recent edition of the Code is the 2022 Edition. Given that the most recent version of the Food Code is “hot off the presses,” we thought it would be a good time to reflect on the types of violations most frequently seen in retail food establishments.
To do that, we enlisted the help of experts in this field. The Top 5 Violations across the U.S. were pulled together with the help of a third-party proprietary technology that aggregates and standardizes public health inspection data. The analysis was done against a large representative sample of data from local health department jurisdictions across the U.S. We then asked Dr. Hal King, Managing Partner of Active Food Safety, to help provide advice on how establishments can best prevent these violations.
Top 5 U.S. Health Inspection Violations for 2022 Based on Applicable Code Section of the FDA Food Code
- Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils
- Cleaning, Frequency, and Restrictions
- Good Repair and Proper Adjustment - Equipment
- Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding
- Certified Food Protection Manager
#1: Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils (Applicable Code Section 4-601.11) – 7.92% of all violations
#2: Cleaning, Frequency, and Restrictions (Applicable Code Section 6-501.12) – 7.28% of all violations
Experts’ Take: The top two most frequently encountered violations are very similar to one another, with each dealing with different aspects of cleaning within a facility. Section 4-601.11 - Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils, establishes the objective of cleaning within a facility – to prevent the accumulation of organic matter, food debris, and soil within a facility that could attracted unwanted pathogenic microorganisms and pests. Accumulation of soil could also reduce the efficacy of sanitizers used. This section requires food-contact surfaces to be “clean to sight and touch” and free of “grease deposits and other soil accumulations”, while also requiring nonfood-contact surfaces to be free of accumulation of “dust, dirt, food residue, and other debris”. The second section, 6-501.12 - Cleaning, Frequency, and Restrictions, establishes the need for facilities to clean their physical facilities “as often as necessary to keep them clean.” Basically, facilities should establish a schedule for regular cleaning frequency.
Intuitively, it makes sense why the two most frequently encountered inspection violations are related to cleaning. If a food-contact surface or a nonfood-contact surface are visibly dirty, they are easy to spot during health department inspections. Cleaning takes time (labor) and resources to do properly, which may be challenging for a lot of establishments that are struggling with the current labor shortages. Nevertheless, the public health importance of cleaning within a retail food establishment cannot be overstated. Organic material such as food debris can interfere with the effectiveness of many surface sanitizers and disinfectants used within a facility. Excessive soil buildup may lead to the proliferation of pathogenic bacteria, which can establish niches in these nutrient-rich environments (Listeria monocytogenes is a great example of this). Likewise, unclean surfaces with grease, fats, and oils are more difficult to sanitize properly, and can reduce the efficacy of sanitizers against pathogens. Not only is excessive uncleanliness a public health risk, but it is also a risk to a food establishment’s business, as a guest’s perception of a facility is often tied to its cleanliness.
There are several steps establishments can take to prevent the risk of these violations tied to a lack of cleaning:
- Build a Solid Cleaning Foundation – Cleaning is an important task that takes resources, such as time, labor, cleaning products, and cleaning tools. These are foundational aspects of a cleaning program – if any of these are missing, then the risk for encountering violations related to cleanliness are much higher. Are staff being given adequate time to clean these surfaces properly? Are staff provided with the right tools, including effective cleaning (and sanitizing) chemistries, effective cleaning tools (brushes, mops, etc.) that are in working condition? Are management and senior staff emphasizing the importance of cleanliness? Are they monitoring employees to ensure proper cleaning is being performed? These are all excellent questions that should be asked periodically by individuals who help manage a food safety program within an establishment. Doing so will help build the foundation for a cleaning program that can reduce the risk of inspection violations.
- Adopt “Best in Class” Practices and Tools Where Possible – Once the foundation of a cleaning program is laid, then the program itself can be revised over time for continuous improvement. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) should be periodically reviewed internally especially if there is a change in menu or facility design (e.g., adding raw protein like chicken into the food preparation process). External review by a Food Safety expert can also be valuable, as their outside perspective can provide advice for improvements while reducing redundancies that might impact labor. These SOPs can also help with preparedness for emergency situations, such as boil water advisories or public health emergencies. Choosing the best cleaning products for your specific facility will also help reduce the time it takes to effectively clean. The type of cleaning products used in an establishment ideally should be matched to the type of soil that is of a concern – not all products have equal effectiveness in the presence of various soils. Many modern products are also dual use in the sense that they are simultaneously cleaners and sanitizers/disinfectants. This may help reduce the time it takes to clean and sanitize effectively.
- Create a culture of “Clean” – It is crucial that all members within a facility understand the importance of maintaining clean facilities. This starts with the management team – often if management deems something important, then many of the staff will see this and emphasize that importance. Asking your customers about the cleanliness of your foodservice establishment can also provide important feedback to the team; especially since issues with cleanliness can affect the customer experience and lead to reduced sales. This can have a big impact on the effectiveness of a cleaning program within a facility.
#3: Good Repair and Proper Adjustment - Equipment (Applicable Code Section 4-501.11) – 5.52% of all violations
#4: Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding (Applicable Code Section 3-501.16) – 5.45% of all violations
Experts’ Take: The third and fourth most frequently encountered violations are also closely tied to one another. Section 4-501.11 – Good Repair and Proper Adjustment, is a broad section that covers equipment used in a facility. In general, this section states that all equipment used in a facility should be maintained in a state of good repair. A refrigerator that is no longer able to keep food cold, a hot bar that is no longer able to keep food warm, and a ware washing machine that is not dispensing sanitizer or reaching sanitization temperatures, are all excellent examples of equipment failures that can lead to a violation of this applicable Code section.
Equipment failure can then lead to a violation of the next most frequently encountered. Section 3-501.16 – Time/Temperature Control for Safety Food, Hot and Cold Holding, is arguably one of the most important sections of the FDA Food Code. This section is focused around hot and cold holding of food after it has been prepared. Foods that support the growth of pathogenic bacteria are subject to this section and are often called TCS foods. When provisions of this section are not followed, the proliferation of dangerous bacteria or their toxins in food can occur, which may lead to outbreaks. This section describes a temperature range of 41oF to 135oF as the temperature “Danger Zone.” When TCS foods are held for long periods of time in this temperature range, growth of harmful bacteria such as Listeria monocytogenes, Bacillus cereus, and Clostridium perfringens and production of toxins can occur. Numerous outbreaks have occurred due to failure of hot or cold holding requirements, emphasizing the importance of this section at reducing foodborne illness outbreaks.
How can these equipment and temperature control failure violations be controlled?
- Routine Equipment Validation and Inspection – Equipment for handling and holding of food within a food establishment is often one of the most significant investments an operator or owner makes. Similar to an automobile, these pieces of equipment often require routine inspections and preventive maintenance in order for them to operate properly over a long period of time. Keeping a routine equipment inspection schedule (e.g., every quarter) that includes validation of the equipment being in good repair is ideal. Newer hot and cold holding equipment can alert operators if a problem is encountered. Speaking of repairs and replacements, it is a good idea for funds to be budgeted for these situations in advance – replacement of this type of equipment can easily reach into the tens of thousands of dollars.
- Proper Equipment Use – Even if hot and cold holding equipment are in a good state of repair and functionality, failures can still occur if the equipment is not used correctly. For example, coolers and display cases for cold holding rely on circulating cold air to maintain temperatures. If these pieces of equipment are overfilled with food, they can often stop working correctly, which can lead to elevated temperatures. Always refer to the manufacturer’s supplied instructions for information related to proper equipment use.
- Thermometer Use – So, you’ve invested in new equipment and followed instructions on use. How do you ensure everything is working properly? Use a calibrated thermometer! Thermometers should be on hand and widely used for many food holding and cooking procedures, like checking the temperature on cooked food to ensure the proper temperature was met during heating for pathogen kill. For holding of foods, ensure food is not being held within the “Danger Zone,” which as we mentioned previously is 41oF to 135oF. Proper thermometer use in a food establishment is a great way to reduce the chances of encountering a violation of our #3 and #4 most frequently encountered health code violations. And don’t forget to clean and sanitize thermometers in between uses to prevent any cross-contamination potential!
#5: Certified Food Protection Manager (Applicable Code Section 2-102.12) – 4.06% of all violations
Experts’ Take: This specific section of the FDA Food Code requires the “person in charge” (e.g., the manager) at the establishment to be a certified “Food Protection Manager.” To be certified, the individual must pass a knowledge test as part of an accredited course. According to the FDA, “Food protection managers have an important role in formulating policies, verifying food employees carry out these policies, and communicating with these same employees to give information about recommended practices to reduce the risk of foodborne illness.” A certified manager should be present at all times food is being prepared, handled, or sold.
Managers who are certified Food Protection Managers carry more knowledge related to foodborne illness risks than those without this training and certification. This knowledge naturally flows down to the staff members they manage. Does this translate to reduce risk for foodborne illness outbreaks? Research by both the FDA2 and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention3 suggests so, with evidence pointing to the lack of a Food Protection Manager as a major risk factor for foodborne illness outbreaks.
There are many accredited programs where individuals can obtain a certification, with many offering in-home tests that take less than a full day. The Conference for Food Protection establishes the criteria for these certification programs, and The American National Standards Institute (ANSI) serves as the accrediting body. More information on programs available can be found here https://anab.ansi.org/credentialing/food-protection-manager.
Closing Thoughts – While the FDA Food Code will evolve over time, core food safety principles important for reducing foodborne illness will always remain the same. It is interesting that many of these core principles are reflected in the top violations encountered across the U.S. Maintaining clean facilities not only improves guest experience, but it also helps reduce the chance of pests and pathogenic organisms from establishing themselves in the facility. Practicing proper hot and cold holding, along with maintenance of equipment can help reduce the chance of pathogenic bacteria growing to dangerous levels in food that has been prepared. Finally, ensuring the person in charge is also a certified food protection manager will help to ensure that best practices for food safety are followed by all employees.
For more information on PURELL® Foodservice Surface Sanitizing Wipes and Spray, visit GOJO.com/surfaces.